PERJURY

                            WHEN YOU SWEAR ON A STACK OF BIBLES AND LIE IN COURT,IS THAT PERJURY?   IN THE CASEY ANTHONY TRIAL IT APPEARS ANYTHING GOES.  ALL THE COMMENTATORS SAYS THEY WOULD LIE ON THE STAND TO KEEP THEIR CHILD OUT OF THE DEATH PENALTY.  SO DO YOU PROMISE TO TELL THE TRUTH ,THE WHOLE TRUTH AND NOTHING BUT THE TRUTH SO HELP YOU GOD DOESN'T APPLY.  THAT'S NEWS TO ME! 
                                Lee Anthony just contradicted his mother and said that she said she was sending Dominic Casey out into the woods TO SEARCH FOR CAYLEE'S BODY.  LEE WAS UPSET BECAUSE NO ONE HAD TOLD ME THAT THEY'D GIVEN UP LOOKING FOR A LIVING CHILD BUT NOW A DEAD CHILD.  HIS MOTHER HAD A TIP FROM A PSYCHIC TO LOOK IN THE NEARBY WOODS.   
                              NOW CRONK IS ON THE STAND AND SAYS HE THOUGHT HE HAD SEEN A SKULL IN THE WOODS  IN AUGUST.  HE INSISTED THAT THE POLICE TAKE A LOOK IN THE WOODS NEAR THE ANTHONY HOME ON HOPESPRING DRIVE.    HE WAS THERE WHEN THEY LOOKED.  BUT HE DIDN'T GO INTO THE WOODS WITH THE POLICEMAN.  THE POLICE DID NOT GO VERY FAR BECAUSE HE WAS AFRAID OF SNAKES.  CRONK USED TO BE A BOUNTY HUNTER IN ANOTHER STATE.  HIS GIRLFRIEND WORKS AT THE JAIL WHERE CASEY ANTHONY WAS DETAINED.  LEONARD PEDILLA,THE BOUNTY HUNTER WHO BAILED CASEY ANTHONY OUT SAYS CRONK HAD INSIDE INFORMATION FROM ATTORNEY-CLIENT DISCUSSIONS AT THE JAIL THROUGH HIS GIRLFRIEND.  PEDILLA SAYS CRONK WAS TRYING TO COLLECT THE REWARD FOR FINDING CAYLEE ANTHONY,THE MISSING CHILD.
                              IN JOSE BAEZ'S OPEINING STATEMENT,HE ACCUSED CRONK OF MOVING CAYLEE ANTHONY'S BODY.  HE PUT IT BACK IN DECEMBER AND SAID HE FOUND IT IN THE WOODS.  THIS TIME THE POLICE DID FIND THE BODY.  I DON'T KNOW IF CRONK GOT A REWARD.
                              SO IT APPEARS EVERYONE LIES IN COURT TO SAVE THEIR SKIN OR SOMEONE ELSE'S.   LAWYERS,WITNESSES,EXPERTS AND DEFENDANTS ALL LIE ABOUT THE DEATH OF A TWO YEAR OLD.  THE  ONLY HONEST PERSON IS THE JUDGE.  PEOPLE QUESTION WHETHER HE HAS BEEN FAIR TO THE DEFENSE.  COMMENTATORS ACCUSE THE JUDGE OF NOT BEING LENIENT ENOUGH ABOUT ADMISSABLE TESTIMONY AND EVIDENCE IN A CAPITAL CASE.
                               SO WHO KNOWS?   YOU JUST NEED REASONABLE DOUBT OR SOMEONE WHO ACTUALLY TELLS THE TRUTH.